Trílogo alternatives · 2026

Trílogo alternatives: maintenance software with more features and integration

Trílogo with no trial and few public reviews? Compare platforms with more verified data and real integrations.

OVERVIEW

Trílogo alternatives: maintenance software with more features and integration

Trílogo is a Brazilian platform known for serving companies that manage external teams: scheduling with geolocation, checklists, audits and asset inventory control, all in Portuguese and with pricing plans published openly, from R$49 to R$149 per user/month. It is a direct proposition for anyone moving out of spreadsheets who needs to organise the basics of maintenance and asset control.

Even so, some teams reach a point where Trílogo leaves gaps: the independent review base is extremely small, there is no free trial to validate the system before committing, and API access is reserved for the most expensive plan. For growing operations, or ones that depend on integrations with other systems or need more advanced data to make decisions, this can mean a low ceiling.

In this article, we compare Trílogo with four other maintenance and facilities management platforms used in Brazil, including Infraspeak, evaluating features, price, integrations and what verified users say on Capterra and G2.

METHODOLOGY

How we evaluated these alternatives

To build this comparison, we evaluated each platform on five fronts that matter most to Brazilian maintenance and facilities operations. We used only data published by vendors, Capterra and G2, all with the source cited.

  • Mobile and offline capability

    How well the field app works without depending on a constant connection.

  • Integration with other systems

    Integration with other systems, especially ERPs used by medium and large companies.

  • Pricing flexibility

    Whether the model adapts to the size of the operation or requires negotiation for everything.

  • Ease of use for technical teams

    Ease of use for technical teams with no prior familiarity with management software.

  • Scalability

    Whether the platform still makes sense when the company grows from a dozen to hundreds of assets or users.

SUMMARY COMPARISON

Quick comparison: Infraspeak, Trílogo and other alternatives

Last updated: June 2026 — prices and reviews verified on Capterra and G2.

Platform

Best for

Key differentiator

Starting price

Rating (Capterra)

Infraspeak

Facilities and maintenance with internal teams and external providers, across multiple sectors

Integration ecosystem (Hub), provider collaboration (Network) and AI (Gear)

On request (custom)

4.7 (137 reviews)

Trílogo

SMBs managing external teams and assets in the Brazilian market

Plans with public, fixed per-user pricing

R$49/user/month

5.0 (1 review)*

Auvo

Maintenance and field service teams that need real-time GPS tracking

Real-time technician tracking and PMOC issuance

On request (not published)

4.5 (19 reviews)

Field Control

Small field teams that want to eliminate paper in data collection

Customer portal and geolocation check-in

From R$295/user/month**

4.6 (5 reviews)*

Prisma Facilities

Companies with corporate ERPs (SAP, TOTVS, Oracle) that need integrated maintenance

Native integrations with SAP, TOTVS, Oracle and ServiceNow

On request

4.6 (7 reviews)*

* Small review sample (1–7 reviews). Use it as direction, not as statistically robust data.

** Capterra lists Field Control from R$295/user/month, while the Omie integration store publishes R$525/month for the basic plan (unlimited dashboard + 4 field licences). The sources diverge; confirm directly with the vendor before publishing figures.

LIMITATIONS

Where Trílogo falls short

None of these points invalidates Trílogo as an option for small operations on the right budget. But for teams that are growing, that need more data to decide, or that already use other systems that must talk to each other, it is worth getting to know the alternatives.

Insufficient review base to validate the choice

Trílogo has only one verified review on Capterra and no identified profile on G2. A single 5-star review does not let you spot patterns, recurring problems or what most customers actually think about the platform day to day. For anyone evaluating a recurring investment, that is a real information gap.

No free trial

Trílogo offers neither a free trial nor a free version, according to the data published on Capterra. That means committing to a paid plan, or at least to a sales process, before being able to test the system with the company’s real data and team.

API restricted to the most expensive plan

Of Trílogo’s plan options, API access is only available in Premium (R$149/user/month for companies). Teams that start on Lite or Plus and need to connect Trílogo to an ERP, a BI tool or any in-house system must first upgrade their plan.

No documented third-party integrations

Unlike other platforms on the market, we did not find a public list of native Trílogo integrations with third-party tools (ERP, accounting, communication). The verified features concentrate on the product’s own modules (tickets, checklists, inventory, scheduling).

No AI or IoT in the verified feature set

Trílogo’s confirmed features cover the operational side well (tickets, checklists, audits, digital signature), but do not include failure prediction, AI automation or IoT sensor monitoring. As the operation grows, that can mean relying on manual analysis to identify patterns, such as recurring failures in certain equipment.

THE ALTERNATIVES

The Trílogo alternatives worth evaluating in 2026

#1 · Alternative

Infraspeak

4.7Capterra

Facilities and maintenance with internal teams and external providers, across sectors

Pros
  • Intuitive interface, with fast adoption even by technical teams with no prior CAFM experience
  • Customer support cited as a strong point (4.8/5 for support on Capterra)
  • Real-time data centralisation, eliminating spreadsheet-based control
  • Relatively agile implementation and integration for the scale of the platform
  • Complete mobile app for field technicians
Cons
  • Steeper learning curve for anyone who has never used a CAFM system
  • Advanced reporting may depend on additional modules or tools
  • Inventory management module still evolving, according to users
  • First data migration can be laborious on large bases, though the support team assists the process

With Infraspeak, there is a different path.

Infraspeak is a collaborative intelligent maintenance management platform, founded in 2015 and used by more than 900 companies worldwide, including names such as Siemens, Veolia, Sandvik, Mitsubishi Electric, Engie and Primark. Unlike a tool designed only for field teams, Infraspeak connects internal teams, external providers and building users in a single place, under the "Work as One" concept.

How Infraspeak addresses the gaps
  • On validation: Infraspeak has 137 verified reviews on Capterra (4.7 rating) plus another 34 on G2 (4.6 rating), as well as a consistent 4.7 rating on GetApp. That is a real dataset for understanding usage patterns, not an isolated sample.
  • On integrations: Infraspeak Hub™ connects the platform to ERP, CRM, BMS and IoT systems as part of the product design, not as an add-on feature. Today there are already more than 20 verified native integrations, including QuickBooks Online, Zoho CRM, Slack, WhatsApp, Google Sheets, Gmail and Microsoft Teams.
  • On data and prediction: Infraspeak Gear™ uses AI for automation and forecasting within the maintenance operation, and Infraspeak Network™ lets you collaborate directly with external providers — exactly the kind of external-team management that leads many people to look at Trílogo in the first place.
  • A point of honesty here: like Trílogo, Infraspeak also works with a sales-led commercial model, with no public price table. This is offset by guided onboarding and a dedicated customer success team, but anyone looking for immediate self-service should be aware of it before getting in touch.
Key features
  • Corrective and preventive work-order management, with scheduling and recurrences
  • Asset tracking via QR code and NFC
  • Inventory and purchasing management
  • Compliance and inspection management (SLA, audits)
  • Customisable dashboards and analytics
  • Infraspeak Gear™ (AI for forecasting and automation)
  • Infraspeak Network™ (collaboration with external providers)
  • Infraspeak Hub™ (integrations with ERP, CRM, BMS and IoT)
  • Mobile app (iOS and Android)
  • Support in Portuguese, English, French, Spanish and Polish
Pricing

Infraspeak does not publish a public price table; the model is customised according to team size and type of operation, through a conversation with the sales team.

  • Capterra: 4.7/5 (137 reviews)
  • G2: 4.6/5 (34 reviews)
  • Customer support: 4.8/5
#2 · Alternative

Auvo

4.5Capterra

Maintenance and field service teams that need real-time GPS tracking

Pros
  • Real-time technician tracking is the feature most cited by Brazilian users
  • Implementation and support during onboarding well rated
  • Automatic generation of field reports, eliminating manual processes
Cons
  • Weak integration between the main Auvo and the AuvoDesk module, which sit on separate platforms
  • Inventory control considered limited by some users
  • Back-office features (such as WhatsApp communication with customers) still limited

Auvo positions itself as one of the leading external-team management platforms in Brazil, focused on maintenance, field services, HVAC and electronic security. In 2024–2025, the company expanded the product with Auvo Service (field operations) and Auvo Hub (a CRM with AI).

Key features
  • Team scheduling and routing
  • Digital work orders
  • Real-time GPS tracking
  • Check-in/check-out with validation
  • Customisable forms with photos and electronic signature
  • PMOC issuance for HVAC
  • Integrated CRM with AI agents (Auvo Hub)
Pricing

Not published. Auvo works with custom per-user pricing, through sales contact. It offers a free trial with no credit card required.

  • Capterra: 4.5/5 (19 verified reviews)
#3 · Alternative

Field Control

4.6Capterra

Small field teams that want to move off paper quickly

Pros
  • Simple and practical to deploy, with access via computer and mobile
  • Well-rated customer service (5.0/5 on the support criterion)
  • Eliminates paperwork and speeds up the delivery of service reports
Cons
  • Records considered inflexible by users, with no direct link by equipment type
  • Financial module flagged as needing improvement
  • Offline operation not yet 100% reliable, according to a user report

Field Control is described by Capterra itself as a Brazilian field service management tool with geolocation, process and task management and reporting. It is a lean option for anyone who wants to move off paper quickly.

Key features
  • Digital work orders with geolocation
  • Check-in/check-out with a minimum radius of 300 metres
  • Real-time technician tracking
  • Customisable forms with photos and videos
  • Customer electronic signature
  • Customer portal to follow up on requests
  • Materials management
Pricing

Capterra lists it from R$295/user/month; the Omie integration store publishes R$525/month for the basic plan with 4 field licences, plus R$89/month per additional licence. The two sources diverge, so it is worth confirming directly with the vendor. According to Capterra, Field Control offers a free trial and a free version.

  • Capterra: 4.6/5 (5 verified reviews — small sample, use as direction)
#4 · Alternative

Prisma Facilities

4.6Capterra

Companies already running corporate ERPs that need integrated maintenance

Pros
  • High customisation capability, including dashboards and advanced SQL queries
  • Asset management and preventive plans cited as strong points by users
  • Effective replacement of manual spreadsheet controls, according to customer reports
Cons
  • Some simple features are locked behind additional costs
  • Integration with systems outside the supported ERP ecosystem can present difficulties, according to a user
  • Document management module flagged as an area to improve

Prisma Facilities is a Brazilian facilities management solution aimed at companies that already run corporate ERPs. It has native integrations with SAP, TOTVS, Oracle and ServiceNow, which points to a positioning closer to medium and large operations already structured around those systems.

Key features
  • Asset management and preventive maintenance plans
  • Customisable dashboards
  • Event automation
  • Advanced queries via SQL
  • Management of preventive, corrective and inspection tickets
  • Automatic productivity reports
Pricing

On request, with no free version or trial available, according to Capterra.

  • Capterra: 4.6/5 (7 verified reviews — small sample)

INTEGRATIONS

Integrations

For operations in Brazil, the ability to connect the maintenance system to other tools (ERP, finance, communication) usually weighs heavily in the decision, especially as the company grows.

Trílogo reserves API access for the Premium plan and does not have, in the verified public data, a list of native third-party integrations. Prisma Facilities goes the opposite way: it was born to talk to corporate ERPs such as SAP, TOTVS and Oracle, but with pricing on request and no trial. Infraspeak, in turn, positions integration as a central part of the product, with Infraspeak Hub™ connecting ERP, CRM, BMS and IoT systems, more than 20 native integrations already confirmed (QuickBooks Online, Zoho CRM, Slack, WhatsApp, Google Sheets, Gmail, Microsoft Teams, PayPal) and Infraspeak Network™ for direct collaboration with external providers, without relying on spreadsheets or parallel email exchanges.

None of the platforms analysed publishes, in the verified data, a list of specific SAP connectors in the case of Infraspeak. If integration with a specific ERP is a non-negotiable requirement, it is worth confirming directly with each vendor before deciding.

DECISION GUIDE

Which Trílogo alternative is right for you?

The right answer depends on what your operation already has and what you are trying to solve.

  • Your priority is to keep a public, low price with little need for external integrations, in a small operationTrílogo

    Trílogo itself (or a similar tool) may still make sense.

  • What you are missing is well-established real-time GPS tracking of technicians in the Brazilian marketAuvo

    Auvo is a mature option for that specific use case.

  • Your goal is to move off paper quickly, with a simple portal for the customer to follow requestsField Control

    Field Control meets that need with a relatively low initial investment, even though the published prices from the two available sources diverge.

  • The company already runs SAP, TOTVS or Oracle and needs maintenance to talk directly to that ecosystemPrisma Facilities

    Prisma Facilities was designed for that scenario.

  • Your operation spans multiple sectors and several teams (internal and external), and needs a larger review history to back the decision, plus a growth path that includes AI and broader integrationsInfraspeak

    Infraspeak is the most complete option among the five.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is Trílogo still a good option?

2. How much does Trílogo cost?

3. Is it possible to migrate from Trílogo to Infraspeak?

4. What is the best free alternative to Trílogo?

5. What are the main differences between Infraspeak and Trílogo?

6. Does Trílogo offer API access?

Talk to the Infraspeak team and see if the platform solves what Trílogo does not cover

Book a demo with Infraspeak and see how an open ecosystem connects internal teams, external providers, ERPs and IoT in a single platform. Or explore Infraspeak customer stories.