Auvo alternatives · 2026

Auvo alternatives: maintenance management platforms that go further

Has your operation outgrown Auvo's scheduling and field tracking? Compare platforms with complete asset management, inventory and ERP integration.

OVERVIEW

Auvo alternatives: maintenance management platforms that go further

Auvo is a well-known name in field team management in Brazil, with one feature its users rate especially highly: real-time tracking of technicians in the field. Maintenance, HVAC and electronic security companies have used the platform for years to eliminate manual control of schedules and reports.

But teams that grow beyond simple scheduling and work orders start to feel the limits. Auvo reviewers on Capterra repeatedly point to a lack of depth in equipment management, weak integration between the Auvo and AuvoDesk modules, and limited back-office features for inventory control and customer communication.

If your operation is no longer just about “where is the technician right now” and has come to require complete asset management, preventive maintenance, compliance and ERP integration, it is worth exploring the alternatives. We compared Auvo with Infraspeak, Field Control, Trílogo and Fracttal One, based on verified Capterra reviews and public information from each vendor.

METHODOLOGY

How we evaluated these alternatives

We evaluated each platform against the five criteria that matter most to maintenance and facilities teams in Brazil. No brand pays for placement in this comparison.

  • Mobile and offline capability

    Mobile and offline capability for field technicians without a stable connection.

  • ERP integration

    Depth of ERP integration, especially SAP, common in mid-size and large operations.

  • Pricing flexibility

    Pricing flexibility for teams that grow in a non-linear way.

  • Ease of use

    Ease of use for technicians and operational teams with no prior experience of management software.

  • Scalability

    The ability to scale from a simple field operation to complete asset and compliance management.

SUMMARY COMPARISON

Quick comparison table

Platform

Best for

Key differentiator

Starting price

Rating

Infraspeak

Multi-site facilities that need complete asset management and compliance

Collaborative platform (Infraspeak Network) uniting internal teams, providers and stakeholders

On request

Capterra 4.7 (137) / G2 4.6 (34)

Auvo

Field teams that prioritise simple tracking and fast implementation

Real-time GPS tracking and quick onboarding

On request

Capterra 4.5 (19)

Field Control

Small field teams on a tight budget

Customer portal and geolocation check-in

From R$295/user/month (Capterra)*

Capterra 4.6 (5)**

Trílogo

Teams that want a public pricing table, without going through sales

Published per-user pricing, no commercial proposal needed

From R$49/user/month

Capterra 5.0 (1)**

Fracttal One

Operations ready to move from team tracking into asset management with IoT

Complete CMMS/EAM with IoT monitoring and SAP/Oracle integrations

Free Starter plan; paid plan on request

1,700+ reviews on GetApp; exact rating not confirmed

*The Omie Store lists a basic plan at R$525/month (dashboard + 4 licences); sources diverge, so treat this as an estimate and confirm directly with the vendor. **Small sample. Use as a reference, not a statistical measure. Data verified on Capterra in July 2026.

LIMITATIONS

Where Auvo falls short

Auvo solves one specific problem well: knowing where the technician is and whether they have received, viewed and started the job. But as the operation grows, three gaps show up frequently in the comments of those who already use the platform.

Shallow equipment management

According to one long-time user, Auvo has invested more in ERP features than in equipment management — precisely the core of maintenance work. Without a maintenance history per asset and automated preventive plans, the team still depends on manual control to know when each piece of equipment needs attention.

Modules that don’t talk to each other

AuvoDesk, designed for ticketing, runs on a separate platform from the main Auvo. Reviewers report a lack of API for AuvoDesk to connect to the company website and no dedicated mobile app for the end customer or the ticket-management team. Teams using both modules end up dealing with two systems that don’t fully talk to each other.

Limited back-office

Users report difficulty with inventory control and ask for more customer-communication features, including native WhatsApp integration (today reliant on third-party apps). Add to this occasional reports of slowness and sync errors in the mobile app, and what emerges is a solid field-tracking tool that is incomplete for anyone who needs to manage the asset lifecycle, not just the technician’s movement.

THE ALTERNATIVES

The Auvo alternatives worth evaluating in 2026

#1 · Alternative

Infraspeak

4.7Capterra

Multi-site facilities that need complete asset management and compliance

Pros
  • Consistently well-rated customer support (4.8/5 for support, based on 133 Capterra reviews)
  • Interface seen as intuitive even by technical teams with no prior CAFM experience
  • Full coverage of the asset lifecycle, not just team movement
  • Data centralisation that replaces spreadsheet-based control
Cons
  • No public pricing table, which requires a sales-contact step before comparing costs
  • Initial learning curve for teams that have never used a CAFM system
  • Smaller brand presence in Brazil today compared with local vendors such as Auvo itself

With Infraspeak, there is a different path.

The platform was built to connect internal teams, external service providers and building users in a single place, under the “Work as One” concept. Today it serves more than 900 companies worldwide, including Siemens, Veolia, Sandvik, Mitsubishi Electric, Engie and Primark, and manages over 3 million assets every day.

One customer who swapped manual Excel control for Infraspeak summed up the change well: before, information was printed and handed out to teams, causing constant data loss; afterwards, every request had a status that was visible and traceable to everyone involved.

How Infraspeak addresses the gaps
  • Equipment management: every asset has a full history, a customised preventive maintenance plan (PPM) and centralised documentation — team tracking is part of the flow, not the whole product.
  • Integrated modules: the Infraspeak Network connects internal teams, service providers and suppliers on a single platform, removing the need to switch between separate systems to open and track tickets.
  • Complete back-office: stock and inventory management, purchasing and compliance within the same environment as work orders, reducing reliance on parallel spreadsheets.
Key features
  • Complete maintenance history per asset, with automated preventive plans
  • Infraspeak Network for collaboration between internal teams, external providers and suppliers
  • Stock and inventory management integrated into the work-order flow
  • Customisable checklists and forms with photos and electronic signature
  • Full mobile app for field technicians, with photo upload and real-time task updates
  • Integrations with ERPs, including SAP, plus connectivity with IoT sensors
Pricing

Infraspeak does not publish a public pricing table. The model is customised, defined together with the sales team according to the number of users and modules required — less predictable at first glance, but tailored to the real size of the operation instead of forcing a fixed plan.

  • Capterra: 4.7/5 (137 reviews)
  • G2: 4.6/5 (34 reviews) · Support: 4.8/5
#2 · Alternative

Field Control

4.6Capterra

Small field teams on a tight budget

Pros
  • Customer portal included, something Auvo does not offer natively
  • Recurring praise for customer support (5.0 rating for support on Capterra)
  • Mobile and web apps available for the whole team
Cons
  • Only 5 public Capterra reviews, a small base for a reliable statistical read
  • Reviewers point to inflexible records, with no direct link between form and equipment type
  • Offline operation still reported as incomplete by at least one user

Field Control is a Brazilian field-team management tool with geolocation, task management and reporting, in the same segment as Auvo. One Auvo reviewer, explaining why they chose Auvo, described Field Control as “more complex and much more expensive”, which places it a notch more robust (and pricier) within this category.

Key features
  • Digital work orders with geolocation and check-in within a minimum 300-metre radius
  • Customer portal for tracking history and opening tickets
  • Customisable forms with photos, videos and the customer’s electronic signature
  • Materials and products management
  • Mobile app for iOS and Android
Pricing

Capterra lists a starting price of R$295 per user/month, while Omie’s integration store lists a basic plan at R$525/month (unlimited dashboard + 4 field licences, plus R$89/month per extra licence). Sources diverge, so confirm the current figure directly with the vendor before committing to a plan.

  • Capterra: 4.6/5 (5 reviews — small sample)
#3 · Alternative

Trílogo

5.0Capterra

Teams that want a public pricing table, without going through sales

Pros
  • Full pricing transparency, something no other platform on this list offers
  • Asset auditing and inventory features included from the Plus plan
  • WhatsApp support available on the Plus and Premium plans
Cons
  • Only one public Capterra review so far, which doesn’t allow the experience to be validated consistently
  • No free trial, which makes it harder to test the platform before subscribing
  • A smaller volume of public reviews makes it harder to confirm support robustness at scale

Trílogo is another Brazilian platform focused on field-team and asset management, with a rare differentiator in this category: openly published pricing, with no need to go through a commercial proposal to know the cost.

Key features
  • Corrective maintenance tickets and preventive checklists
  • Asset auditing and inventory
  • Scheduling with grid, calendar, Gantt and map views
  • Digital signature and asset location tracking
  • QR Code and RFID for equipment identification
  • API available on the Premium plan
Pricing

The Lite plan costs R$49 per user/month, Plus R$99 and Premium R$149, all with equivalent options for service providers. There is no free version or trial period.

  • Capterra: 5.0/5 (1 review — very small sample)
#4 · Alternative

Fracttal One

Operations ready to move from team tracking into IoT asset management

Pros
  • A genuine free plan available to start at no cost
  • Value for money frequently cited by users versus North American alternatives
  • Customer support described as fast and approachable
Cons
  • Initial setup reported as laborious, especially when registering locations, equipment and stock
  • Strong dependence on an internet connection, with limited offline access
  • Work orders can’t be edited after closing, forcing some users to keep parallel controls in Excel

Fracttal One is a complete CMMS/EAM with a strong presence in Latin America, including Brazil. Unlike Auvo, Field Control and Trílogo — which start out as field-team management tools — Fracttal One starts out as an asset management system, which makes it the closest option to Infraspeak in terms of scope.

Key features
  • Work-order management with preventive and corrective maintenance
  • Asset management with a full hierarchy
  • IoT monitoring via proprietary sensors (Fracttal Sense)
  • Integrations with SAP, Oracle and Salesforce
  • Artificial-intelligence assistant for analysis and suggestions
  • 100% mobile app for iOS and Android
Pricing

The Starter plan is free, with basic maintenance-management features. Features such as IoT, automatic reminders and advanced BI sit in the paid plan, whose price is not published.

  • GetApp: 1,700+ reviews; exact rating not confirmed

INTEGRATIONS

Integrations: why they matter when leaving Auvo

One of the gaps most cited by Auvo users is precisely the lack of depth in integrations, since the product focuses its development around its own internal ERP rather than open connectivity. For operations that already use a corporate ERP such as SAP, this becomes a real limitation.

Infraspeak treats integration as a core part of the offering, not an add-on. Beyond connectors with ERPs such as SAP, the platform includes the Infraspeak Network, a shared space where internal teams, service providers and suppliers collaborate without switching systems. This covers the same problem that leads Auvo users to complain about the lack of communication between Auvo and AuvoDesk, but on a larger scale: instead of two modules from the same vendor that don’t fully talk to each other, a single network connects every link in the operation. The platform also supports connectivity with IoT sensors and building-automation devices, useful for operations that are also seeking predictive asset monitoring.

DECISION GUIDE

Which Auvo alternative is right for you?

The right choice depends on your team size, budget and priorities. This summary can help guide the decision:

  • You need simplicity and field tracking with the least possible frictionAuvo / Field Control

    Auvo remains solid at what it sets out to do; Field Control is the closest alternative in the same format, though with a higher investment.

  • Price transparency is the deciding factor before even talking to a salespersonTrílogo

    Trílogo is the only platform on this list that publishes its prices openly.

  • Your operation is ready to move from scheduling into asset management with predictive monitoringFracttal One

    Fracttal One is a natural path, especially with the free plan to test the model.

  • You manage multiple sites, need documented compliance and real ERP integration, and want to unite internal teams, providers and suppliers in a single collaborative networkInfraspeak

    Infraspeak is the option built for this scenario.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is Auvo still a good option?

2. How much does Auvo cost?

3. Is it possible to migrate from Auvo to Infraspeak?

4. What is the cheapest Auvo alternative?

5. What are the main differences between Infraspeak and Auvo?

Ready to see beyond field tracking?

Book a demo and see how Infraspeak manages the complete lifecycle of your assets, not just your team’s location. Want to see success stories first?