Competitor Comparison · June 2026

Infraspeak vs Rosmiman

Which CMMS should you choose to manage maintenance and facilities?

4.7/5Capterra rating (140 reviews)
4.6/5G2 rating (34 reviews)
4.8/5Customer support (Capterra)
Intro

Are you evaluating Infraspeak and Rosmiman to manage the maintenance and facilities of your organisation? Both platforms compete in the Spanish CMMS market, but they start from different philosophies and serve clearly distinct customer profiles.

Rosmiman is a Spanish solution with more than 25 years of track record, built especially for medium and large organisations in industrial sectors such as energy, automotive and public administration. Infraspeak is a next-generation maintenance and facilities management platform, designed to connect every actor in the FM cycle — internal teams, contractors, suppliers and building users — in a single collaborative environment.

In this comparison we analyse the key features, the user experience, real customer reviews, the implementation model and the profiles each tool fits best. The goal is not to declare a universal winner, but to help you identify which one adapts better to the specific needs of your operation.

TL;DR — Quick verdict

Choose Infraspeak if your team works in facilities management or FM services in hospitality, retail, healthcare, education or offices, and you need a collaborative, modern and intuitive platform that can be up and running quickly and connects everyone involved in the operation.

Choose Rosmiman if you manage complex industrial assets — energy, automotive, infrastructure or Spanish public administration — and you need an EAM/IWMS solution with functional depth, on-premise deployment available and local support in Spanish from a team with decades of experience in the Spanish market.

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Infraspeak vs Rosmiman

Last updated: June 2026. Highlighted data has been verified against publicly available information. Ratings come from Capterra.

RosmimanInfraspeak
Capterra rating4.1 ★ (48 reviews)4.7 ★ (140 reviews)
Ease of use (Capterra)3.94.7
Customer support (Capterra)3.64.8
G2 presenceNo active reviews4.6 ★ (34 reviews)
HeadquartersElche, Alicante, SpainPorto, Portugal (office in Barcelona)
Year founded19942015
CategoryIWMS / CAFM / industrial EAMIMMP / CMMS / collaborative CMMS
Work order managementFull, oriented to industrial assetsFull, real-time updates
Preventive maintenancePreventive and regulatory scheduling with reference databasesAutomatic scheduling based on real usage and asset data
Asset managementFull asset lifecycle — deep EAMFull history, health scores, IoT
Mobile appiOS + Android + Windows — functional, not the differentiatoriOS + Android, role-dedicated interface (Infraspeak Next)
AI and automationMentioned in marketing materials; not highlighted in reviewsInfraspeak Gear AI — predictions, alerts, automation
IoT integrationCompatible; integrations mainly with Spanish ecosystemsNative — sensors and NFC devices
ERP / systems integrationsSAP FI, Remedy, 4me, Power BI — Spanish-speaking ecosystemMore than 100 integrations (SAP, BMS, ERPs)
Supplier networkNotices and contractors portal availableInfraspeak Network — real-time collaboration
Regulatory complianceNative Spanish technical-legal complianceSLAs, audits, safety checklists
DeploymentCloud, on-premise or hybridSaaS cloud
PriceCustom — contact salesCustom — contact sales
Best forEnergy, automotive, public administration, infrastructureHospitality, retail, multi-site FM, facilities services

Data verified against publicly available information and Capterra (June 2026).

WHERE ROSMIMAN FALLS SHORT

Rosmiman: limitations according to users

Rosmiman is a platform with 30 years of history in the Spanish market and real functional depth in industrial and public administration environments. However, the users who work with it today recurrently identify a series of frictions worth knowing before making a decision.

An interface that reflects its history

The most consistent criticism in verified Capterra reviews is the complexity of the interface. Users with years of experience on the platform note that the menus are extensive, that locating specific features requires dedicated training, and that the interdependencies between elements have a steep learning curve. An FM director with more than two years of use describes the interface as "a little outdated." For teams that need to onboard field technicians quickly — or where staff changes frequently — the barrier to entry is real.

Mobile app: functional, but not the core

Several users with years of experience note that Rosmiman still has room to improve on mobile. José, Maintenance Director in the pharmaceutical sector and a user of more than 20 years, notes on Capterra: "The mobile app should see more development and improvement, along with dashboard reporting." This reflects a recurring pattern in reviews: the app is described as functional, but not as the core of the user experience.

Performance and data export

System slowness under load is a recurring theme. Users describe slowdowns during bulk data loads and difficulties exporting information via Excel. Sessions can expire easily. A maintenance manager in the logistics sector points to the "impossibility of integrating predictive maintenance" and the "difficulty of exporting data" as active limitations in their deployment.

Support and change-implementation times

Several reviewers indicate that the support team’s response speed and the implementation of custom modifications are slower than expected once the initial rollout phase is over. A manager with ten years of use comments that "the monthly cost of licences is high nowadays" and that the "speed of implementing new modifications" has been the biggest problem.

No active presence on G2

Rosmiman has no active reviews on G2, where a vendor profile exists but with no product ratings. It is worth noting that G2 has a reviewer base oriented mainly to the English-speaking and international market; the absence of G2 reviews is common in platforms aimed at the Spanish market and does not necessarily reflect the tool’s customer share. For buyers who use G2 as a habitual reference, this can limit the available information; in that case, Capterra (with 48 verified reviews, mostly from Spanish users) is the most relevant source for evaluating Rosmiman.

User experience

An experience designed for real work

Infraspeak starts from a different approach: it does not add modules on top of a legacy architecture, but connects every actor in the FM process — field technicians, managers, suppliers, building users — in a single collaborative environment, with intelligence built in from the ground up.

The feature most mentioned by Infraspeak users — in both English and Spanish reviews — is ease of use. Field technicians adopt the platform with minimal training. The Infraspeak Next app offers role-dedicated interfaces: one view for the FM manager, another for the field technician, another for the external supplier. This reduces the learning curve and lets teams with different levels of digital experience work on the same platform.

A maintenance manager at Ale-Hop — a Spanish retail chain — describes the experience: "Intuitive and easy to use, both for managers and for maintainers, technicians and store staff." A hotel maintenance lead with a multi-hotel operation notes that rolling out the second hotel "was done in a single day."

Artificial intelligence

Infraspeak Gear AI: intelligence that reduces manual work

Infraspeak Gear is the platform’s artificial-intelligence layer. It detects anomalies in equipment, generates alerts before failures happen, automates the assignment of work orders by specialty and technician availability, and produces performance reports automatically.

For teams with distributed operations — multiple buildings, multiple contractors — this represents a real reduction in the volume of manual management.

Supplier network

The Infraspeak Network: the supplier as part of the flow

One of Infraspeak’s most concrete differentiators is the Infraspeak Network: a collaborative environment where external suppliers and contractors work directly on the same platform, with their own access and their own interfaces.

This eliminates communication over email and other informal channels to coordinate external work and gives real-time visibility over the status of each intervention.

Multi-site visibility

Real-time visibility for multi-site operations

For managers overseeing several locations — hotel chains, retail networks, corporate building operators — Infraspeak offers centralised visibility: work-order status, SLA compliance, performance by asset, inventory alerts.

A public administration maintenance lead describes how the platform changed the way they manage their operation: "Before, we managed everything on printed Excel spreadsheets. Now we have full control over the inventory and we get alerts when an item is about to run out."

IoT & integrations

IoT and frictionless integrations

Infraspeak connects with IoT sensors, NFC and QR tags, and more than 100 external systems — ERP, BMS, HR platforms, BI tools — without needing custom development for the most common cases.

The integration with Google Sheets for data export is frequently mentioned as practical by users who need to feed external dashboards.

INTEGRATIONS

Integrations and ecosystem

  • Infraspeak

    Infraspeak connects with more than 100 external platforms, including SAP, BMS (Building Management Systems), HR tools, European ERPs, IoT solutions and field hardware such as NFC readers. The Infraspeak Network extends this ecosystem to suppliers and contractors, who join the workflow without needing to install additional software. Infraspeak’s API enables custom integrations for organisations with specific technical requirements.

  • Rosmiman

    Rosmiman has a solid track record of integrations with corporate systems within the Spanish enterprise ecosystem: SAP FI, Remedy, 4me, Power BI, and public administration systems. For organisations already operating on these platforms that need a CMMS to integrate with their current ERP, Rosmiman has proven references. Integrations with systems outside the Spanish-speaking ecosystem typically require custom development.

IMPLEMENTATION & ONBOARDING

Implementation and going live

Infraspeak

Infraspeak’s implementation process is designed to reduce time to productivity. The platform assigns a dedicated onboarding team that supports the customer during initial configuration, training and go-live. Users consistently highlight the quality of support during this process: on-site visits, live sessions and access to self-training resources. The learning curve exists — especially for organisations with no prior experience of CMMS platforms — but users agree that results arrive quickly: from Excel spreadsheets and paper printouts to full visibility in days or weeks. For multi-site operations, configuring the first site serves as a replicable template. Infraspeak’s post-implementation support scores 4.8 out of 5 on Capterra, the highest of the two providers compared in this guide.

Rosmiman

Rosmiman offers a guided implementation process, with a dedicated technical team and weekly follow-up during go-live. Reviewers with experience on the platform value the initial support positively. However, several warn that the full implementation — especially when it involves advanced customisation and connection with corporate systems — can extend over time and consume significant internal resources. For organisations willing to invest in a deep implementation, Rosmiman can adapt to very specific workflows. For teams that need to be operational quickly, the process can turn out longer than expected.

PRICING & VALUE

Pricing and value

Both platforms use a custom pricing model: neither Infraspeak nor Rosmiman publishes fixed rates. In both cases you need to contact the sales team for a proposal tailored to team size, number of assets and the modules required.

RosmimanInfraspeak
Pricing modelCustom — contact salesCustom — contact sales
Free version / trialNoNo (guided demos)
Published improvement dataUp to −83% MTTR, up to +91% SLA compliance (vendor data)
DeploymentCloud, on-premise or hybridSaaS cloud

The pricing conversation should focus on the expected return: lower unplanned-maintenance costs, longer asset lifespan and technical-team efficiency.

WHAT REAL USERS SAY

Verified reviews

Rosmiman

Capterra4.1(48 reviews)

Rosmiman gathers 48 Capterra reviews with a rating of 4.1 out of 5. Long-tenured users — some with more than ten or twenty years — value the functional depth and stability of the system. Several describe Rosmiman as "the best CMMS tool I have worked with" in complex asset-management environments. Criticism concentrates on navigation complexity, system slowness under data load, export difficulties and support response times on incidents. The ease-of-use (3.9) and customer-support (3.6) scores are below Infraspeak’s in both categories. Note: the most recent Capterra review dates from May 2025.

Infraspeak

G24.6(34 reviews)
Capterra4.7(140 reviews)

Infraspeak’s Capterra reviews reflect a consistent pattern: ease of use and support quality are the most repeated attributes. The transition from paper- or Excel-based environments is described as transformative in multiple reviews. Among Spanish-speaking users, adoption stands out in hospitality, retail and real-estate management. Context note: the Spanish Capterra reviews mostly correspond to 2020–2022; the most recent English reviews are from November 2025. The most mentioned areas for improvement include the need for pre-loaded preventive-maintenance templates, limitations in some reporting features for advanced analysis, and an initial learning curve that can be steep for teams with no prior CMMS experience.

WHO SHOULD CHOOSE WHICH?

Which should your organisation choose?

Choose Infraspeak if...

  • Your operation focuses on facilities management in hospitality, retail, healthcare, education, offices or FM services.

  • You need field technicians, managers, suppliers and building users to work on the same platform.

  • Ease of adoption and time to productivity are critical factors.

  • You operate across multiple sites and need centralised real-time visibility.

  • You want to integrate IoT, sensors and automations without custom development.

Choose Rosmiman if...

  • You manage complex industrial assets in energy, automotive, utilities or critical infrastructure.

  • You operate mainly in Spain or Spanish-speaking markets and need native technical-legal regulatory compliance, including public procurement.

  • Your organisation manages distributed operations across multiple countries and needs an IWMS with proven multinational references (Rosmiman currently operates in Europe, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa).

  • Your organisation requires on-premise deployment or a hybrid model.

  • Your selection process is formal (a public tender, for example) and you need a vendor with decades of references in the Spanish market.

  • You have the internal resources to manage a technically complex implementation.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can I migrate from Rosmiman to Infraspeak?

2. Is Infraspeak suitable for the industrial sector or Spanish public administration?

3. How does customer support compare between the two platforms?

4. Do both platforms have a mobile app?

5. What are the ratings on review platforms?

Take the next step

Ready to see Infraspeak in action?

Want to see how Infraspeak can adapt to your organisation’s maintenance management? Book a demo with the Infraspeak team and discover how other organisations in Spain have changed the way they manage their FM operation.