What's your SLA compliance? One in six FM teams can't say
One in six FM teams (17.4%) can't give a single performance figure. See what the visibility gap hides and which facilities management KPIs to start with.
One in six FM teams (17.4%) can't give a single performance figure. See what the visibility gap hides and which facilities management KPIs to start with.

Ask an FM team for its SLA compliance, its cost per site or its backlog, and one in six (17.4%) can't give you a single number, according to The State of FM Operations 2027: The FM Gaps. Those are basic facilities management KPIs, and without them it's hard to show leadership what FM is worth.
The report calls this the visibility gap: the risks and results FM leaders can't see or measure, from compliance and supplier performance to basic KPIs. Here's what it hides, what it costs, and which numbers to start with.
The visibility gap is the risks and results FM leaders can't see or measure, from compliance and supplier performance to basic KPIs. It's one of three gaps the report finds in FM operations, alongside the admin gap and the connection gap.
The numbers come from conversations with 1,071 FM teams between September 2025 and September 2026:
Indicator | Share of FM teams |
|---|---|
Name poor visibility and reporting as a pain | 73.4% |
Name compliance and documents as a pain | 29.5% |
Name supplier management as a pain | 27.4% |
Name reactive maintenance as a pain | 25.7% |
Couldn't give any figure for how their operation performs | 17.4% |
Read the first row against the next three. Nearly three in four teams say visibility is a pain, yet fewer than one in three name the things they'd most want to see: compliance, suppliers and the pattern behind the breakdowns.
Because teams describe the symptoms and rarely name the system behind them: the late report, the call to the one technician who picks up, the breakdown with no history. Reactive maintenance, the industry's defining problem, is named by just 25.7%.
That's the FM Iceberg. The visible 20% (clean buildings, closed work orders) is what people judge you on. The submerged 80% (compliance, contracts, supplier performance, fragmented data) is where the risk and the value live. It tends to surface the hard way:
At one multinational, a fire certificate at one of its offices had been expired for four years. Nobody noticed.
One operations team told us that finding a single air-conditioning certificate in the shared drive takes about 20 minutes.
One organisation spends one to three days every month reconciling 6,000 daily meal entries against supplier invoices by hand.
Credibility first, then the seat at the table. FM shapes cost, risk, compliance and the experience of everyone in the building, yet it's hard to claim a place at the executive table without numbers that leadership trusts. When someone asks "what does FM cost per site?", the honest answer is "I'll get back to you".
This isn't new. Infraspeak's State of FM Operations Report 2026 found critical areas like supplier performance, health and safety and compliance with no KPIs at all. A year on, many teams still don't have them.
There's a second cost: no system, AI included, can flag a risk that nobody has recorded.
It shows up everywhere, but each market feels it differently:
Brazil. 80.9% name poor visibility as a pain (73.4% overall), and 65.2% say their current setup falls short on reporting, the highest of any market (49.9% overall). One warehouse operator spends two days a month building management reports by hand, so the figures are out of date by the time anyone sees them.
Portugal. Teams complain least about reporting (30.4%, against 49.9% overall), yet one in four (25.8%) couldn't give any figure for how the operation performs. One FM company keeps more than 22,000 asset records in its ERP, but staff on site can't access it, so equipment locations get updated by phone and costs end up on the wrong projects.
Spain. 72.7% name poor visibility as a pain. One supermarket chain calls it invisible spend: around 4,000 tickets a month, 80% of its incidents, go ahead under €500 each without a budget check, so the department learns its real costs when the month closes.
UK. Compliance stands out: 52.8% name it as a pain, against 29.5% overall. One manufacturer ran its maintenance on spreadsheets and relied entirely on people remembering preventive work and statutory inspections. A compressor locked out after overrunning its 2,000-hour service interval, and it needed an emergency same-day contractor callout.
France. Two in three teams (66.7%) say their current setup tracks assets and maintenance poorly (54.2% overall). Operations are often specialised (69.6%, against 48.7%), which makes a complete asset history harder to keep. One hospitality group struggles to track subcontracted work across its 55 sites, and for some of them it hadn't received maintenance reports for up to three years.
Two. Pick one or two numbers the team can defend in a meeting, such as SLA compliance and cost per site, and build from there. In practice, that's three moves:
Capture the work once, at the source. You can't measure work that was never written down. Technicians log jobs as they do them and requests come in through one channel, so there's data behind every number.
Bring the iceberg to the surface. Put compliance, supplier performance and asset history where everyone can see them, before an auditor or a broken chiller does it for you. Certificates with an expiry date are a good first candidate, and this guide to compliance in facility management shows what else belongs on the list.
Start measuring what matters. Choose your one or two metrics, then take them to leadership and build the case for a seat at the table from there. If you want a menu, these seven maintenance indicators are the ones used most often, and this guide to facilities management reports covers how to turn them into something leadership reads.
Infraspeak, the collaborative FM platform, is powered by agentic AI that keeps people in control. Here's how it applies to the visibility gap.
FM should run as one connected system. With Infraspeak Network, suppliers work inside the same operation as the teams they serve, and detailed reports show suppliers' true performance.
Technology should take work away, and leave the judgement with people. Infraspeak Gear AI processes uploaded documents and their expiry dates, and document expiry reminders in the Documents app help you avoid missing deadlines.
FM deserves a seat at the table. Personalised dashboard widgets track your KPIs, and the Statutory Compliance dashboard shows which buildings and assets are compliant, need corrective work, are awaiting certification or are non-compliant, so you know where to act first.
The visibility gap is one of three. The State of FM Operations 2027: The FM Gaps also covers the admin gap and the connection gap, the findings for Brazil, Portugal, Spain, the UK and France, and five moves for 2027.