Alternative to Field Control: Prices and Reviews (2026)

Field Control alternative: technical management software for teams that need more

Field Control is a Brazilian field-service management tool, known for its practicality in technician geolocation, filling in customisable forms and communicating with the end client through its own portal. For smaller operations, with lean technical teams and relatively simple work-order needs, it is a straightforward option that is easy to roll out — as confirmed by Capterra reviews that highlight how quickly it is adopted. The product also offers a free trial and a free version, according to Capterra, which lowers the barrier to entry for anyone who wants to test before deciding.

But as an operation grows, or starts to require more robust control over assets, preventive maintenance, compliance and ERP integrations, some of Field Control’s limitations begin to show: inflexible records, unstable offline operation and a review base that is still small to validate the experience across different contexts.

If you are researching alternatives to Field Control, this guide compares the platform with three other Brazilian options — Auvo, Trílogo and Checklist Fácil — and with Infraspeak, assessing each one on mobility and offline operation, ERP integration, pricing flexibility, ease of use for non-technical field teams and the ability to grow with the operation.

Comparison table

Last updated: June 2026 — prices and ratings verified on Capterra and the vendors’ official websites.

Platform	Best for	Key differentiator	Starting price	Rating (Capterra)
Infraspeak	Teams that need complete management of maintenance, assets and compliance, not just field control	Unified platform with AI (Infraspeak Gear™) and a collaborative network with external providers (Infraspeak Network™)	On request (no public tier)	4.7 ⭐ (137 reviews)
Field Control	Small teams that need simple work orders with geolocation	Geolocated check-in/check-out and a follow-up portal for the end client	From R$ 525/month (4 licences); Capterra lists R$ 295/user/month — figures differ*	4.6 ⭐ (5 reviews)*
Auvo	Field-service companies focused on real-time team tracking	Real-time GPS tracking with check-in/check-out validation	On request (no published price)	4.5 ⭐ (19 reviews)
Trílogo	Service providers looking for public, fixed per-user pricing	Plans with published figures from R$ 49/user/month	From R$ 49/user/month	5.0 ⭐ (1 review)*
Checklist Fácil	Companies focused on audits, inspections and process standardisation	AI image recognition for inspections; 150+ checklist features	On request (no public tier)	4.8 ⭐ (105 reviews)

*Field Control (5 reviews) and Trílogo (1 review) have review bases that are too small for statistically robust conclusions; use with that caveat. None of the platforms analysed, except Infraspeak, has a verifiable G2 profile for this category — which is why the column uses the Capterra rating.

#1 · Alternative

Infraspeak

4.7Capterra

Complete maintenance, assets and compliance, not just field control

Pros

Customer support rated 4.8/5 on Capterra, consistently cited as a differentiator
Complete asset, preventive maintenance and compliance management, on top of field control
Collaboration network with external providers (Infraspeak Network™)
Robust mobile app, well rated by field technicians

Cons

Steeper learning curve for anyone who has never used a CAFM system
Advanced analytics and reporting features depend on external tools in some cases
The inventory management module is still evolving, according to user reports
The first data migration can be laborious for large databases

With Infraspeak, there is a more complete way to manage your operation.

Infraspeak is a collaborative intelligent maintenance management platform, founded in 2015 and used by more than 900 companies worldwide to manage over 3 million assets every day. The brand’s positioning — “Work as One” — reflects a focus on connecting internal teams, external providers and other stakeholders in a single platform, rather than just tracking technicians in the field.

Infraspeak serves globally recognised clients such as Siemens, Veolia, Sandvik, Mitsubishi Electric, Engie and Primark (data verified via official Capterra and G2 profiles; these are not necessarily clients with operations in Brazil).

How Infraspeak addresses the gaps

Where Field Control has inflexible records, Infraspeak enables asset tracking via QR code and NFC, with a registration structure adaptable to different equipment types and maintenance processes.
Where Field Control is limited to field-service control, Infraspeak offers a complete preventive maintenance module with scheduling and recurrences, inventory and purchasing management, and compliance management with audits and SLAs — covering the asset’s full lifecycle, not just work-order execution.
With more than 130 reviews on Capterra (4.7 rating) and 34 on G2 (4.6 rating), Infraspeak has a far broader market-validation base than Field Control.

Key features

Complete mobile app for technicians (iOS and Android), with checklist filling, photos and real-time task updates
Infraspeak Network™ — extends collaboration to external providers, something Field Control does not offer natively
Infraspeak Gear™ — an artificial intelligence module for maintenance automation and forecasting

Pricing

Infraspeak does not publish a public price table — the model is personalised, with direct contact with the sales team. Infraspeak does not offer a free trial; the first contact with the platform happens through a guided demo with the sales team.

Capterra: 4.7/5 (137 reviews)
G2: 4.6/5 (34 reviews)
Customer support: 4.8/5

Schedule a demo

#2 · Alternative

Auvo

4.5Capterra

Field-service companies focused on real-time team tracking

Pros

Real-time technician tracking, cited as the most valuable feature by users
Implementation considered easy, with good support during onboarding
Automatic field-report generation, eliminating manual processes
Simple, intuitive interface

Cons

Lack of an API and a dedicated mobile app for the AuvoDesk module (helpdesk)
Weak integration between Auvo and AuvoDesk, which operate on separate platforms
Inventory control considered limited by some users

Auvo is a Brazilian field-team management platform, focused on sectors such as maintenance, HVAC and electronic security. A differentiator cited by users who compared it directly with Field Control is cost: a maintenance manager who chose Auvo reported having assessed Field Control as “a more complex system with a much higher price.”

Key features

Team scheduling and route optimisation
Digital work orders
Real-time location tracking (GPS)
Check-in and check-out with validation
Customisable forms with photos, videos and electronic signature
PMOC issuance for HVAC companies

Pricing

Per-user model, with a free trial available; Auvo does not publish figures on its official site.

Capterra: 4.5/5 (19 reviews)

#3 · Alternative

Trílogo

Service providers looking for public, fixed per-user pricing

Pros

Published, predictable per-user pricing
Relatively accessible entry plan for small operations
Covers both field-team management and asset inventory

Cons

Extremely small review base — just one verified review on Capterra so far, which prevents a statistically robust analysis of the user experience
No free trial, which can make evaluation before purchase harder
No identifiable G2 profile, which limits cross-validation of data

Trílogo is a Brazilian platform focused on managing field teams and assets, with geolocation-based scheduling, execution reports, digital signatures and periodic audits. Its biggest differentiator compared with Field Control and most of the alternatives analysed is pricing transparency: the figures for all its plans are published openly.

Key features

Corrective maintenance tickets
Checklist and preventive maintenance schedule
Quotes and report generation
Auditing and asset inventory
Schedule with grid, calendar, Gantt and map views
QR code, barcode and RFID
API access on the Premium plan

Pricing

Per-user plans from R$ 49/month (Lite), R$ 99/month (Plus) and R$ 149/month (Premium), with no free trial or free version available.

Capterra: 5.0/5 (1 review — insufficient sample)

#4 · Alternative

Checklist Fácil

4.8Capterra

Audits, inspections and process standardisation

Pros

4.8 rating on Capterra, based on 105 reviews — the largest sample among the alternatives analysed in this content
Interface considered very easy to learn, even for teams with no familiarity with technology
Functional offline mode for field use
Automatic reports with photos and evidence, well rated

Cons

Charts and dashboards considered not very customisable by some users
Not a work-order or asset management tool — it covers only checklists and inspections, requiring a complementary tool for complete maintenance management
Mobile app updates perceived as slow by some users

Checklist Fácil is Latin America’s leading platform for digital checklists, audits and inspections, part of the Starian group and with more than 12 years in operation. Unlike Field Control, it is not a work-order or field-team management tool — its focus is exclusively on process standardisation and compliance.

Key features

Digital checklists with more than 150 declared features
Action plans (5W2H)
AI image recognition, with up to 60% reduction in visual inspection time
Offline mode with later synchronisation
Electronic signature and biometrics
More than 7,000 integrations via Zapier

Pricing

Basic, Professional and Enterprise plans, with no published figures; free trial available with no credit card required.

Capterra: 4.8/5 (105 reviews)

Integrations

For operations that already use ERP, CRM or building-automation systems, integration capability is a decisive criterion. Infraspeak connects natively to more than 20 tools, including Slack, WhatsApp, Gmail, Google Sheets, Microsoft Teams, QuickBooks Online and Zoho CRM. On top of that, Infraspeak Hub™ enables deeper integrations with ERP, CRM, BMS and IoT systems, while Infraspeak Network™ extends collaboration to external service providers and suppliers — a capability that none of the alternatives analysed in this content (Field Control, Auvo, Trílogo or Checklist Fácil) offers in an equivalent, publicly documented way.

Field Control, by comparison, has its most documented integration through the Omie app store (aimed at accounting and financial integrations), with no broad native integrations with corporate ERPs, BMS or IoT confirmed publicly. The same applies to Auvo and Trílogo, whose public integration documentation is limited. Checklist Fácil stands out on this point by offering access to more than 7,000 apps via Zapier, although this requires additional configuration rather than direct native connections.

For teams that depend on direct integration with broader financial and operational systems — a recurring criterion among larger Brazilian companies — Infraspeak has the most robust integration documentation among the options compared.

Field Control alternative: technical management software for teams that need more

Field Control alternative: technical management software for teams that need more

How we evaluated these alternatives

Mobility and offline operation

ERP integration

Pricing flexibility

Ease of use for field teams

Ability to scale

Comparison table

Where Field Control falls behind

Inflexible records and forms

Unstable offline operation

Limited focus on asset management and preventive maintenance

Still a small review base

The Field Control alternatives worth evaluating in 2026

Infraspeak

Auvo

Trílogo

Checklist Fácil

Integrations

Which Field Control alternative is right for you?

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is Field Control still a good option?

2. How much does Field Control cost?

3. Is it possible to migrate from Field Control to Infraspeak?

4. What is the best free alternative to Field Control?

5. What are the main differences between Infraspeak and Field Control?

6. Does Field Control work offline?

Ready to see Infraspeak in action?

Infraspeak Platform

Capabilities

Industries

Resources

Infraspeak